Subpage Heading

04 December 2016

Philosophy Lecture at St Mellitus College

‘The Problem of the Problem of Evil’ by Prof. Ian McFarland

Philosophy, RS, and other Collingham students had the opportunity to hear a paper read by a leading academic, Ian McFarland, the Regius Professor from Cambridge.  The topic was the Problem of the Problem of Evil.  We anticipated that we would see it handled in a way that would go beyond the usual A Level studies.

The use of untranslated Latin served to remind students of the importance of intellectual preparation for scholarly study.  This was also a typical academic paper in that McFarland did not with grandiose claims attempt or claim to solve every question, as often happens with popular lectures by public intellectuals, but tried to tease out and clarify just one aspect of the issue, and to see whether that carried the discussion forward.

This he attempted by trying to re-frame one element of the philosophical problem of evil.  If rather than seeing it as an abstract problem of logical consistency given certain assertions, we looked at where the assertions came from, that might reflect back on whether the inconsistency that generates the problem of evil can indeed be stated in the typical stark terms.

There is a problem, McFarland found, with the way the problem of evil is usually formulated.  Part of the problem of evil arises from the assertion that the world contains not just evil consequences of human actions but ‘natural evil’ that can only be traced back to God.

The theist, though, suggested McFarland, is not, indeed should not be, committed to affirming that the world is evil.  Not merely as a denial of the phenomena around us, but because the assertion is epistemologically misplaced in a way which would be at odds with others of the affirmations that make up the formulation of the problem of evil.  Affirming that which as part of the problem of evil would have to be affirmed about God, precludes affirming the evil of the world.  Yet a major part of the problem depends upon the tension between these two sets of affirmations.  We then see, he claimed, that the theist is not, indeed cannot be, committed to affirming that states of affairs are either good or evil.  This would be a category mistake.

All in all, the lecture was an intellectual challenge and it was a treat to have this opportunity for students to see academia at work.

Michael Peat, Head of Philosophy, Collingham.

News Philosophy

News, Philosophy

  • 20 October 2020

    Ski Trip 2020

    Pupils spend a week in the Italian Alps

  • 10 February 2020

    Revision Tips

    Colloingham's Top 5 Revision Tips

  • 03 February 2020

    Curation workshop with Carolyn Sargentson

    Curation workshop at Collingham with art historian Carolyn Sargentson

  • 27 January 2020

    Cars: Accelerating the Modern World

    Students learn about the role of the car in shaping the world we live in today.

  • 24 January 2020

    Duchess of Malfi at the Almeida Theatre

    Students had the oppourtunity to watch a production of the Duchess of Malfi at the Almeida Theatre this week

  • 20 January 2020

    Collingham Football

    Collingham Football team hope for CIFE Football tournament place.

  • 17 January 2020

    Mace Debate: Collingham Vs Fulham School For Boys

    Collingham enters Debating contest for the first time.

  • 13 January 2020

    ‘Making Colour’ workshop

    Art and History of Art Students attend ‘Making Colour’ workshop.

  • 10 January 2020

    The Moon Exhibition

    Electus students visit The Moon Exhibition

  • 08 January 2020

    MINI Factory Trip

    Mini Factory Oxford Trip

Click here to view our news archive
Main page content (1 column)
Main page content (2 column auto)
Left Column
Right Column

Student Profiles

Learn more

University Destinations

Learn more

Contact Us

Get in Touch

Latest News

Read more